Tag Archives: HDR

Image of the week #52

The final image for this year… been a long road but a fun one. I sure hope that this coming year is better for me and for everyone else as well. This sunset was taken from Laguna Beach after a brief but intense rain storm. It was just starting to clear a little locally but then sun peaked out right as it got close to the horizon. You can see Catalina Island off in the distance. Taken with the Fuji X-Pro 1 and a Samyang 14mm lens. Enjoy and thanks for looking this year at my images, many more to come in the following year. Happy New Year everyone!

 

 

Yellowstone NP fall color

At the beginning of October I took a trip with my wife to Montana and Yellowstone National Park. We were a bit late for fall color but there were some areas that had some still hanging around. It was quite cold there and winter was rapidly approaching. Here are few of the fall color landscape shot from the trip. Enjoy.

 

_DSF3909-Edit-Edit-2-web.jpg_DSF3927-Edit-Edit-web.jpg_DSF3942-Edit-Edit-web.jpg_DSF3957-Edit-Edit-web.jpg_DSF3979-web.jpg_DSF3997-web.jpg_MG_1654-Edit-web.jpg_MG_1667-web.jpg_MG_1676-Edit-web.jpg

A look at the Samyang 8mm f2.8 fisheye lens on the X-Pro 1

Samyang announced that they were going to produce some lenses for the Fuji X-Mount and that was good news to me, they have made quality lenses for DSLRS so I was interested to take a look at what they had to offer for the X-Pro 1. The first in a line of X-Mount lenses,the 8mm f2.8 fisheye is a smaller version of the lens used on DSLRS.  The original DSLR lens is designed for an APS sized sensor, but I found it also worked quite well on a full frame camera if you removed the lens shade.  I searched on the internet and did not see a lot of examples with the X-Pro 1, so I decided to rent one to give it a test drive. I have been using Lensrentals.com as my main provider for rental gear, they have been great to deal with and I recommend them highly. When I saw they had the Samyang 8mm fisheye in stock, I placed my order. I usually like to rent something before buying, especially if I am not sure I am going to really want it, also to test performance and quality. Sometimes  I am just curious. Below are some images of the lens on my X-Pro 1.

Fuji X-Pro 1 and 8mm f2.8 fisheye   Fuji X-Pro 1 and 8mm f2.8 fisheye

Lensrentals.com had in stock one of the rebranded lenses. Samyang sells under their name, as well as being rebranded by Rokinon and other lens brands. The quality is the same. Samyang is a Korean based manufacturer that has some excellent optical quality lenses available for affordable prices. I have their 14mm f2.8 and 8mm f3.5 lens for Canon EOS and have been really pleased with the build  and optical quality, the images have been really great from these two lenses. My only real issue with them is they lack the chip to transfer the information about the lens to the camera, so the camera does not know what lens you have on, or what the focal length, or what aperture is currently set. They do offer that for some Nikon lenses, I sure wish they would offer it for Canon!  The Fuji X-Pro 1 is no exception, there is no communication with the camera. Luckily the X-Pro 1 allows you to set a focal length from the menu but you still do not get the aperture information. Bummer!X-Mount and EOS 8mm fisheyes compared

The Rokinon 8mm f2.8 for X-Mount arrived safely from Lensrentals.com and came with a small case to carry the lens. At first glance this lens is really tiny when compared to the EOS version. Pictured to the right is the EOS and X-mount versions compared side by side. The EOS version is mounted on the Kipon X-Mount to EOS adapter  and the lens shade has been removed. I did this to allow it to be used on a full frame camera. Samyang now sells it with a removable shade. The build quality of the smaller cousin is up to the normal standard for Samyang. Well made and not cheap feeling.  Th focus ring is smooth and the aperture ring has nice positive stops. The aperture ring is only in half stops and not thirds. The lens is nice and compact and about the same size as the Fuji 18mm f2 when compared side by side.

18mm compared to 8mm

The electronic viewfinder is the best method of focusing and framing while using the X-Pro 1. The field of view is so extreme that you really do need to see what the sensor sees.  This lens is considered a full frame fisheye, and this is full frame not in the sense of sensor size but the fact that the image is the equivalent of taking the largest rectangular image out of a spherical image projection. This gives an approximate 180 degrees field of view from corner to corner on a diagonal across the long side of the sensor and it does comes pretty close, but hard to actually measure.  This means that if you are looking to do equirectangular panoramas then you will also need to shoot a nadir image and a zenith shot. Shown below is a 360×150 degree panorama flattened, the zenith and nadir were cropped because I did not take those images. So the edge to edge coverage across the long side is 150 degrees. Six exposures, taken with a lot of overlap and assembled in PTGUI. Of the sample images shown this was the only in which a tripod was used, along with a RRS panorama head. With careful calibration you could take the image as 5 exposures and include one up and one down for zenith and nadir coverage.

6 shot Laguna Beach panorama

To view the above panorama as a virtual 360 panorama, you will need Quicktime, and click on this link: LB VR Pano

The fisheye distortion can be corrected in software, there are currently no lens profles available for this camera and lens combination but they might be available at some point. PTLENS, Adobe Camera RAW,  and Lightroom will allow you to correct the distortion manually. Photoshop CS6 can also correct for fisheye distortion, that is a new feature with CS6. However the distortion can be interesting and can be used in an artful manner, so it is up to the photographer to decide what post processing is necessary.

The image quality is quite good and it can focus quite close with a huge depth of field. So manually focusing is quite easy and easy enough to just set an approximate distance and be quite sure that most all will be in focus. Like any uber-wide angle lens, shooting it wide open at f2.8 and also because of the fish eye distortion, the corners of the image can be a little soft but it is totally usable and stop it down a bit and you won’t notice. The lens coatings seems to handle flare pretty well, although with something this wide it is hard not to get some flare. Color and contrast are good.

The extreme wide angle can also create some other “issues”. I normally hold the camera with my right hand over the shutter and gripping the camera while my left hand cradles the lens so that I have fast access to the focus and aperture rings. While using this lens you have to be careful as I found I was often getting my knuckles and part of my hand in the shot! Also while holding  the camera, especially in the portrait orientation, tilting the camera down slightly often caused me to get my elbow or my feet in the image. So you really need to scout around the viewfinder and look at the whole frame before pressing the shutter button.

So is it worth buying?  I would say yes. It is certainly not a “must have” lens but it is an interesting lens with a novel effect which can be used quite creatively. It can also  be used to create stunning virtual tours using an appropriate panorama head on a tripod. Price is reasonable and the build quality is good, so if you are in the market for a specialty lens like this, I would definitely get one.

Below are some sample images. The interior shots of the church are taken with the camera resting on the pews at very high iso with bracketing. When the light is so low and shutter speed gets down to 1/30 of a second the camera will bracket using the ISO, when in autoISO mode, so that can be useful. The highest ISO used was 6400. The other building shown is the Pasadena City Hall, one of my favorite buildings to photograph. I did not do any distortion correction in the sample below. Click on the thumbnails to see slightly larger versions you can also take a look at this same set of images on Flickr: 8mm sample images

_DSF5117-web.jpg_DSF4986_HDR-web.jpg_DSF5002_HDR-web.jpg_DSF5008_HDR-web.jpg_DSF5012-web.jpg_DSF5024-web.jpg_DSF5029-web.jpg_DSF5059_HDR-web.jpg_DSF5062-web.jpg_DSF5066-web.jpg_DSF5078-web.jpg_DSF5080_HDR-web.jpg

Image of the week #44

Here is another fall color image, taken with the X-Pro 1 and the 18mm lens. This was taken on a week long trip to Montana and a quickie visit to Yellowstone. We had a great time visiting some friends and doing some photography. I am woefully way behind on my editing but I hope to have that done pretty soon and the images up and posted. I hope you enjoy this view of some fall color in the Lamar Valley.

 

 

Image of the week #29

This is a re-edit of an image from the Huntington, actually 3 images, done as an HDR, I wanted to try out some new techniques. Taken at the Huntington Library gardens, using the Fuji X-Pro 1, 35mm f1.4 lens at f8.

 

Image of the week #14

This weeks is a view of the Japanese Garden at Descanso Gardens in La Canada on a nice sunny spring afternoon. Taken with a Canon 5DmarkII and a Tokina 16-28mm lens at f11. Beautiful garden but very difficult to capture, lots of different light zones. Hope you enjoy it.

 

 

Image of the week #12

This week’s image was one I took back in May of 2011, but I have since learned some new skills in editing and I think it has made some improvements to the image. This was taken near Page, Arizona, some nice sandstone sculpted by wind and rain, taken with a Canon 5Dm2 and a Zeiss 21mm lens. I really like the 3d effect, this was just an awesome day to be out doing some photography. Enjoy.

Image of the week #10

Well it is hard to believe that 10 weeks have already gone by since the start of the year, time flies so to speak. This week’s image is of a stack of railroad wheels that are now scrap that were sent back for repair/service. This open air yard had hundreds of these wheel sets, most with recent dates on them. On the premises are some large buildings where they seem to work 7 days a week on these wheels. It is impressive to see how massive they are and I know I could not get one to budge, so literally there are tons of them at this location. I have no other information on what they do or how they repair them, but the wheels themselves make for interesting subjects. These are located in Mojave, Ca. This was taken with a Canon 5DmII and a Zeiss 35mm f2 lens, and processed in photomatix, lightroom and then turned to black and white using Silver Efex Pro 2. I think the border really adds to the feel of this image, and the late day light made for some long soft shadows. It is hard to get an idea of size but I am sure most of you have seen railroad cars so that might help give some scale.  Hope you enjoy it.

Railroad wheel sets

HDR photography: What’s the big deal?

HDR photography or high dynamic range photography can generate a lot of controversy in some circles. Especially in the online forums; mention that you have taken an image using HDR techniques and you will get very polarized responses. This polarization is kind of funny, in my opinion. Photographers will either love it or hate it, although there some that are a little bit in the middle, but basically very polarized, they either love it or hate it.. I’m not so sure why this is such a big controversy after all it’s just a technique, a tool, that the photographer can use to process an image. This tool can be used in many ways. To me, it is a tool that is used to enhance an image to the photographer’s “vision”. So what’s the big deal? In reality it’s no different than using any other tool. There are lots of tools, and different filters and plug-ins you can get for Photoshop. For instance, Topaz Lab’s “Adjust” and Nik’s “Color Efex Pro4”. If you adjust the sliders and play around you can make a gaudy looking highly saturated low contrast images that are no different than some of the HDR photography! On the other hand, those same plugins can be used to make subtle changes, it is up to the user to control. If you mention that you used the plugins, the response is usually “toned down”, but if you label it HDR, watch out.  It all comes down to the photographer’s vision for the image, the story the photographer is trying to tell; the message to be conveyed. How the artist gets to the end result is through the use of tools, and how much or how little they are applied, again is up to the artist and what they envision.

My theory as to why it is so polarizing is some photographers have a preconception of what an image should look like. Not necessarily, what the human eye sees, but what they envisioned the sensor or the media can successfully capture. Is this right? Is this wrong? The only right answer is if it matches the photographer’s vision. Sometimes there is fear in new techniques that are not “mainstream”. The HDR technique is no different than blending exposures, it is just the method and how it is finally processed.  Many photographer’s blend several exposures to bring out details in the shadows or to bring back highlights that were blown out in the single exposure. Sensors can only capture so much light, so much dynamic range. So that leads some photographers to have this preconception that if you have details in the shadows and if there are extreme details in the highlights, with a very high dynamic range then it must be artificial. And if you label it HDR, then their bias slams to the front, the blinders come on and the wall is built. Then post that same image and mention that you took a couple of exposures and blended them together and often you will get a lot of constructive comments. Not always but generally it’s a much more relaxed and much, much less of a reaction then if you label it HDR. So I think this is just one of those biases that photographers will just have to get over. I think that you’ll see more and more high dynamic range imaging. And how it’s processed is up to the vision and skills of the photographer. It is, after all, used to show what they envisioned at the time capture. At some point in time, sensors will be capable of capturing huge dynamic ranges but until that time we will have to use the tools that we have available.

Yes we’ve all seen extremes in this type of photography. I have seen a lot of images that could have been captured with a single exposure but yet they bracketed and processed it as a HDR image. They might have very low contrast, very highly saturated colors but if the image is what the photographer is happy with, what’s wrong with that? Who is to say whether that’s right or wrong? It may not appeal to the vast majority of viewers, but it doesn’t make it any less valid of an image or “vision”.

Then there are images in which a single exposure could never capture the full range of values, and this is where the HDR technique really shines. You can then express to the viewer more of what you saw with your own eye, if that is what you want to share. It gives you greater latitude to express yourself. It is not evil, it is not a trick or something that is going to go away anytime soon. It does not need to be feared.

The funny thing is that when you talk to people who are casual users of cameras, the ones not hounding the forums, or avid photographers, they are very accommodating to the use of HDR techniques. Perhaps because they are evaluating the image, and not the way the image was processed. Perhaps they are seeing the vision that the artist was trying to convey rather than bogged down in techniques or what they deem to be acceptable. Maybe they are not as influenced by preconceptions.

To paraphrase David duChemin (Craft and Vision – Great ebooks at great prices), it is all about “the vision and not the gear”, or the technique. So again I ask, what’s the big deal?